JellyfinvsSonarQube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Jellyfin | SonarQube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 118 in Media Server | #2 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 58 772 | 11 125 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 298 | +103 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 12 |
| Latest release | v12.4 · 26 Oct 2026 | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Jellyfin scores 88/100 against 71/100 for SonarQube, so it is the safer default.
Jellyfin ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for SonarQube.
If you want the quickest setup, Jellyfin is easier to run; SonarQube needs more configuration.
Jellyfin is growing faster right now (+1 298 stars in 30 days).
Jellyfin details →SonarQube details →
Swap a project
Keep Jellyfin, compare it with
Keep SonarQube, compare it with