SonarQubevsSRS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SonarQube | SRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Code Review | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 11 125 | 29 391 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +103 | +112 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 13 |
| Latest release | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | C |
Which one should you pick?
SRS scores 78/100 against 71/100 for SonarQube, so it is the safer default.
SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for SonarQube.
If you want the quickest setup, SRS is easier to run; SonarQube needs more configuration.
SonarQube details →SRS details →