SonarQubevsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SonarQube | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Code Review | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 11 125 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +103 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 6 |
| Latest release | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 71/100 for SonarQube, so it is the safer default.
SonarQube ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
SonarQube details →Tube Archivist details →