AutoGPTvsUrocissa
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AutoGPT | Urocissa | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 209 in AI Agents | #11 of 19 in Photo Galleries |
| GitHub stars | 187 811 | 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +274 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 18 |
| Latest release | — | 3.4.2 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 48/100 for Urocissa, so it is the safer default.
Urocissa ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.
If you want the quickest setup, Urocissa is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.
AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+274 stars in 30 days).
AutoGPT details →Urocissa details →