AutoGPTvsOrca
Two self-hosted AI Agents projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AutoGPT | Orca | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 91/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 187 798 | 108 446 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +282 | +8 539 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 15 |
| Latest release | — | v1.4.243 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Orca scores 91/100 against 85/100 for AutoGPT, so it is the safer default.
Orca ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.
If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.
Orca is growing faster right now (+8 539 stars in 30 days).
AutoGPT details →Orca details →All AI Agents projects →
Swap a project
Keep AutoGPT, compare it with
Keep Orca, compare it with