langflowvsUrocissa
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| langflow | Urocissa | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #11 of 19 in Photo Galleries |
| GitHub stars | 156 138 | 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +916 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 18 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | 3.4.2 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 48/100 for Urocissa, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for Urocissa.
langflow is growing faster right now (+916 stars in 30 days).
langflow details →Urocissa details →
Swap a project
Keep langflow, compare it with
Keep Urocissa, compare it with