AutoGPTvsurl-to-png
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AutoGPT | url-to-png | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 209 in AI Agents | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 187 807 | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +291 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 |
| Latest release | — | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.
url-to-png ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.
If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.
AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+291 stars in 30 days).
AutoGPT details →url-to-png details →