langflowvsurl-to-png
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| langflow | url-to-png | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 156 109 | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +918 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.
If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; langflow needs more configuration.
langflow is growing faster right now (+918 stars in 30 days).
langflow details →url-to-png details →
Swap a project
Keep langflow, compare it with
Keep url-to-png, compare it with