AutoGPTvsQMReader
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AutoGPT | QMReader | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 209 in AI Agents | #41 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 187 803 | 261 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +287 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 |
| Latest release | — | v1.0.14 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 47/100 for QMReader, so it is the safer default.
QMReader ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.
If you want the quickest setup, QMReader is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.
AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+287 stars in 30 days).
AutoGPT details →QMReader details →