OrcavsQMReader
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Orca | QMReader | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 209 in AI Agents | #41 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 109 022 | 261 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 115 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 12 |
| Latest release | v1.4.243 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.0.14 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Orca scores 91/100 against 47/100 for QMReader, so it is the safer default.
Orca ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for QMReader.
If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; QMReader needs more configuration.
Orca is growing faster right now (+9 115 stars in 30 days).
Orca details →QMReader details →
Swap a project
Keep Orca, compare it with
Keep QMReader, compare it with