AutoGPTvspandaprobe
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AutoGPT | pandaprobe | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 209 in AI Agents | #43 of 124 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 187 812 | 792 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +275 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 16 |
| Latest release | — | v0.7.0 · 4 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 51/100 for pandaprobe, so it is the safer default.
pandaprobe ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.
If you want the quickest setup, pandaprobe is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.
AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+275 stars in 30 days).
AutoGPT details →pandaprobe details →