AutoGPTvsOtoDock
Two self-hosted AI Agents projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AutoGPT | OtoDock | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 209 in AI Agents | #104 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 187 804 | 193 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +288 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v1.9.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 49/100 for OtoDock, so it is the safer default.
OtoDock ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.
If you want the quickest setup, OtoDock is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.
AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+288 stars in 30 days).
AutoGPT details →OtoDock details →All AI Agents projects →