OrcavsOtoDock
Two self-hosted AI Agents projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Orca | OtoDock | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 209 in AI Agents | #104 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 108 739 | 193 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 832 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.4.243 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.9.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Orca scores 91/100 against 49/100 for OtoDock, so it is the safer default.
Orca ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OtoDock.
If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; OtoDock needs more configuration.
Orca is growing faster right now (+8 832 stars in 30 days).
Orca details →OtoDock details →All AI Agents projects →
Swap a project
Keep Orca, compare it with
Keep OtoDock, compare it with