AppsmithvsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Appsmith | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Internal Tools | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 41 134 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +198 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.6.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Appsmith scores 80/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
Appsmith ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
Appsmith is growing faster right now (+198 stars in 30 days).
Appsmith details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep Appsmith, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with