BackstagevsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Backstage | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 166 in Developer Tools | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 34 740 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +58 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.57.0-next.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Backstage scores 79/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
Backstage ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
If you want the quickest setup, Uptime-Kuma-Web-API is easier to run; Backstage needs more configuration.
Backstage is growing faster right now (+58 stars in 30 days).
Backstage details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →