illa-buildervsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| illa-builder | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 17 in Low Code | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 12 336 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
illa-builder scores 67/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Uptime-Kuma-Web-API is easier to run; illa-builder needs more configuration.
illa-builder is growing faster right now (+12 stars in 30 days).
illa-builder details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →