Workout.coolvsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Workout.cool | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 8 653 | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +154 | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Zammad scores 70/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.
Workout.cool ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
Workout.cool details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with