wgervsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| wger | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 7 202 | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +241 | +103 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 0 |
| Latest release | 2.7 · 3 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
wger scores 73/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
wger ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, wger is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
wger is growing faster right now (+241 stars in 30 days).
wger details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep wger, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with