SparkyFitnessvsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SparkyFitness | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 6 503 | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +392 | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.10.0 · 29 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Zammad scores 70/100 against 66/100 for SparkyFitness, so it is the safer default.
SparkyFitness ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, SparkyFitness is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
SparkyFitness is growing faster right now (+392 stars in 30 days).
SparkyFitness details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep SparkyFitness, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with