Windows ARMvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Windows ARM | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Virtualization | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 2 260 | 8 066 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +158 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 11 |
| Latest release | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Batchfile | Go |
Which one should you pick?
woodpecker-ci scores 73/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.
If you want the quickest setup, woodpecker-ci is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
woodpecker-ci is growing faster right now (+158 stars in 30 days).
Windows ARM details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with