Incusvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Incus | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 44 in Container Management | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 6 515 | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +275 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 11 |
| Latest release | v7.0.2 · 16 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Incus scores 75/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.
Incus ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.
If you want the quickest setup, woodpecker-ci is easier to run; Incus needs more configuration.
Incus details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep Incus, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with