e2bvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| e2b | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 14 593 | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +655 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 73 | 11 |
| Latest release | @e2b/cli@2.23.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
e2b scores 76/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.
e2b ships more often: 73 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.
e2b is growing faster right now (+655 stars in 30 days).
e2b details →woodpecker-ci details →