url-to-pngvsZabbix
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| url-to-png | Zabbix | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 256 | 6 519 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +108 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go Template |
Which one should you pick?
Zabbix scores 75/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.
url-to-png ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zabbix.
If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; Zabbix needs more configuration.
Zabbix is growing faster right now (+108 stars in 30 days).
url-to-png details →Zabbix details →
Swap a project
Keep url-to-png, compare it with
Keep Zabbix, compare it with