Huginnvsurl-to-png
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Huginn | url-to-png | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 26 in Automation | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 50 164 | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +180 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 2 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.26 · 26 Oct 2026 | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Huginn scores 80/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.
Huginn ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.
If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; Huginn needs more configuration.
Huginn is growing faster right now (+180 stars in 30 days).
Huginn details →url-to-png details →
Swap a project
Keep Huginn, compare it with
Keep url-to-png, compare it with