firecrawlvsurl-to-png
Two self-hosted Web Scraping projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| firecrawl | url-to-png | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in Web Scraping | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 196 274 | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 381 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 2 |
| Latest release | apps/go-sdk/v1.15.0 · 8 Sept 2026 | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
firecrawl scores 91/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.
firecrawl ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.
If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; firecrawl needs more configuration.
firecrawl is growing faster right now (+12 381 stars in 30 days).
firecrawl details →url-to-png details →All Web Scraping projects →
Swap a project
Keep firecrawl, compare it with
Keep url-to-png, compare it with