url-to-pngvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| url-to-png | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 256 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.
If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
url-to-png details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep url-to-png, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with