Urbitvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Urbit | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Operating System | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 3 622 | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 11 |
| Latest release | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | hoon | Go |
Which one should you pick?
woodpecker-ci scores 73/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.
woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.
If you want the quickest setup, woodpecker-ci is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
woodpecker-ci is growing faster right now (+157 stars in 30 days).
Urbit details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep Urbit, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with