UrbitvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Urbit | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Operating System | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 3 622 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 10 |
| Latest release | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | hoon | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Urbit scores 63/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.
Urbit is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).
Urbit details →Windows ARM details →