Urbitvsweb-portal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Urbit | web-portal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Operating System | #23 of 44 in Dashboard |
| GitHub stars | 3 622 | 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 2 |
| Latest release | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 | v2.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | hoon | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Urbit scores 63/100 against 48/100 for web-portal, so it is the safer default.
Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for web-portal.
If you want the quickest setup, web-portal is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
Urbit is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).
Urbit details →web-portal details →
Swap a project
Keep Urbit, compare it with
Keep web-portal, compare it with