web-portalvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| web-portal | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #23 of 44 in Dashboard | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 260 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 48/100 for web-portal, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for web-portal.
If you want the quickest setup, web-portal is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
web-portal is growing faster right now (+1 stars in 30 days).
web-portal details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep web-portal, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with