Uptime-Kuma-Web-APIvsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 39/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 13 in API | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 282 | 89 721 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 382 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 17 |
| Latest release | — | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | — | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
If you want the quickest setup, Uptime-Kuma-Web-API is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 382 stars in 30 days).
Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →World Monitor details →
Swap a project
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with
Keep World Monitor, compare it with