OpenBBvsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenBB | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 10 in Data Management | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 74 840 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +356 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 0 |
| Latest release | openbb-v5.0.0 · 30 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | — |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OpenBB scores 87/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
OpenBB ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
OpenBB is growing faster right now (+356 stars in 30 days).
OpenBB details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenBB, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with