Uptime-Kuma-Web-APIvsWindowsinDocker
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | WindowsinDocker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 39/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 13 in API | #1 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 282 | 53 743 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +348 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | — | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
WindowsinDocker ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+348 stars in 30 days).
Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →WindowsinDocker details →
Swap a project
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with
Keep WindowsinDocker, compare it with