uptime-kumavswyoming-piper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| uptime-kuma | wyoming-piper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #7 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 93 050 | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 256 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 15 |
| Latest release | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 | v2.5.2 · 11 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 52/100 for wyoming-piper, so it is the safer default.
uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for wyoming-piper.
If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; wyoming-piper needs more configuration.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 256 stars in 30 days).
uptime-kuma details →wyoming-piper details →
Swap a project
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with
Keep wyoming-piper, compare it with