World Monitorvswyoming-piper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| World Monitor | wyoming-piper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #7 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 89 739 | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 400 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 15 |
| Latest release | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 | v2.5.2 · 11 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 52/100 for wyoming-piper, so it is the safer default.
World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for wyoming-piper.
If you want the quickest setup, wyoming-piper is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 400 stars in 30 days).
World Monitor details →wyoming-piper details →
Swap a project
Keep World Monitor, compare it with
Keep wyoming-piper, compare it with