elasticsearchvswyoming-piper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| elasticsearch | wyoming-piper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 41 in Search Engines | #7 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 78 428 | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +448 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 32 | 15 |
| Latest release | v9.5.5 · 6 Oct 2026 | v2.5.2 · 11 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Python |
Which one should you pick?
elasticsearch scores 84/100 against 52/100 for wyoming-piper, so it is the safer default.
elasticsearch ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for wyoming-piper.
If you want the quickest setup, wyoming-piper is easier to run; elasticsearch needs more configuration.
elasticsearch is growing faster right now (+448 stars in 30 days).
elasticsearch details →wyoming-piper details →
Swap a project
Keep elasticsearch, compare it with
Keep wyoming-piper, compare it with