TwitchDropsMinervsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| TwitchDropsMiner | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #11 of 23 in Gaming | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 375 | 93 062 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +1 268 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 19 |
| Latest release | v2.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 51/100 for TwitchDropsMiner, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; TwitchDropsMiner needs more configuration.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 268 stars in 30 days).
TwitchDropsMiner details →uptime-kuma details →
Swap a project
Keep TwitchDropsMiner, compare it with
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with