OpenTTDvsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenTTD | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 23 in Gaming | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 8 439 | 93 062 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +143 | +1 268 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 19 |
| Latest release | 15.3 · 4 Apr 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 73/100 for OpenTTD, so it is the safer default.
uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for OpenTTD.
If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; OpenTTD needs more configuration.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 268 stars in 30 days).
OpenTTD details →uptime-kuma details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenTTD, compare it with
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with