trypostvsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| trypost | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 18 in Social Media Management | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 767 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.0.0 · 10 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | PHP | Python |
Which one should you pick?
trypost scores 58/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
trypost ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
If you want the quickest setup, Uptime-Kuma-Web-API is easier to run; trypost needs more configuration.
trypost is growing faster right now (+3 stars in 30 days).
trypost details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep trypost, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with