WeChat Markdown EditorvsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| WeChat Markdown Editor | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 13 481 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +33 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | WTFPL | — |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
WeChat Markdown Editor scores 71/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, WeChat Markdown Editor is easier to run; Uptime-Kuma-Web-API needs more configuration.
WeChat Markdown Editor is growing faster right now (+33 stars in 30 days).
WeChat Markdown Editor details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep WeChat Markdown Editor, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with