Traffic SourcevsWindowsinDocker
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Traffic Source | WindowsinDocker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 27 in Analytics | #1 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 679 | 53 743 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +348 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | — | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 51/100 for Traffic Source, so it is the safer default.
WindowsinDocker ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Traffic Source.
WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+348 stars in 30 days).
Traffic Source details →WindowsinDocker details →
Swap a project
Keep Traffic Source, compare it with
Keep WindowsinDocker, compare it with