Traffic SourcevsUmami
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Traffic Source | Umami | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 27 in Analytics | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 679 | 39 753 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +772 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 13 |
| Latest release | — | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Umami scores 85/100 against 51/100 for Traffic Source, so it is the safer default.
Umami ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Traffic Source.
If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; Traffic Source needs more configuration.
Umami is growing faster right now (+772 stars in 30 days).
Traffic Source details →Umami details →
Swap a project
Keep Traffic Source, compare it with
Keep Umami, compare it with