MetabasevsUmami
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Metabase | Umami | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 49 896 | 39 752 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +498 | +771 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 | 13 |
| Latest release | v0.64.1 · 6 Oct 2026 | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Clojure | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Umami scores 85/100 against 83/100 for Metabase, so it is the safer default.
Metabase ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for Umami.
If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; Metabase needs more configuration.
Metabase details →Umami details →
Swap a project
Keep Metabase, compare it with
Keep Umami, compare it with