MetabasevsTraffic Source
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Metabase | Traffic Source | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #10 of 27 in Analytics |
| GitHub stars | 49 896 | 679 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +498 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.64.1 · 6 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Clojure | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Metabase scores 83/100 against 51/100 for Traffic Source, so it is the safer default.
Metabase ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Traffic Source.
Metabase is growing faster right now (+498 stars in 30 days).
Metabase details →Traffic Source details →
Swap a project
Keep Metabase, compare it with
Keep Traffic Source, compare it with