TradingAgentsvsZed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| TradingAgents | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 209 in AI Agents | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 117 816 | 16 058 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 457 | +243 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 31 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 80/100 for Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), so it is the safer default.
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).
TradingAgents details →Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) details →