TradingAgentsvsZealot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| TradingAgents | Zealot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #17 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 117 967 | 1 367 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 608 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 3 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | 6.2.2 · 25 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 55/100 for Zealot, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Zealot.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 608 stars in 30 days).
TradingAgents details →Zealot details →