langflowvsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| langflow | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 156 109 | 6 046 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +918 | +99 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, langflow is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
langflow is growing faster right now (+918 stars in 30 days).
langflow details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep langflow, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with