TradingAgentsvsWealthfolio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| TradingAgents | Wealthfolio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #5 of 62 in Personal Finance |
| GitHub stars | 118 043 | 9 283 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 684 | +237 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 21 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | v3.11.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 73/100 for Wealthfolio, so it is the safer default.
Wealthfolio ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, Wealthfolio is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 684 stars in 30 days).
TradingAgents details →Wealthfolio details →