TradingAgentsvsvoidaccess
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| TradingAgents | voidaccess | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #28 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 117 848 | 949 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 489 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 18 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | v2.1.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 57/100 for voidaccess, so it is the safer default.
voidaccess ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; voidaccess needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 489 stars in 30 days).
TradingAgents details →voidaccess details →