TradingAgentsvsVert
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| TradingAgents | Vert | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 10 in File Conversion |
| GitHub stars | 117 704 | 16 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 345 | +528 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 71/100 for Vert, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Vert.
If you want the quickest setup, Vert is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 345 stars in 30 days).
TradingAgents details →Vert details →